<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (9) TMI 29 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7356</link>
    <description>Gifted capital introduced into a partnership was not includible in the deceased&#039;s estate where the gifts were genuine and complete. The Court explained that, for section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, possession and enjoyment are not judged by physical control of specific partnership assets; the relevant test is whether the donees retained the gifted property to the entire exclusion of the donor and any benefit to him. Any alleged benefit must arise from the gift itself, not merely from the donor&#039;s separate retained partnership interest. On that basis, section 10 did not apply and the gifted sum was excluded from the estate computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (9) TMI 29 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7356</link>
      <description>Gifted capital introduced into a partnership was not includible in the deceased&#039;s estate where the gifts were genuine and complete. The Court explained that, for section 10 of the Estate Duty Act, possession and enjoyment are not judged by physical control of specific partnership assets; the relevant test is whether the donees retained the gifted property to the entire exclusion of the donor and any benefit to him. Any alleged benefit must arise from the gift itself, not merely from the donor&#039;s separate retained partnership interest. On that basis, section 10 did not apply and the gifted sum was excluded from the estate computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>