<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (4) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7353</link>
    <description>Losses from forward contracts in gunnies and oil seeds settled otherwise than by actual delivery were speculative losses under section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. A transaction is speculative if it is settled without actual delivery or transfer, and the parties&#039; original intention is irrelevant. Where such transactions are carried on regularly and systematically for profit, they constitute a distinct speculative business for set-off purposes. The fact that some contracts formed part of the assessee&#039;s broader trading activity did not change their speculative character. The losses were therefore correctly treated as losses in speculative business and disallowance was proper.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (4) TMI 14 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7353</link>
      <description>Losses from forward contracts in gunnies and oil seeds settled otherwise than by actual delivery were speculative losses under section 24(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. A transaction is speculative if it is settled without actual delivery or transfer, and the parties&#039; original intention is irrelevant. Where such transactions are carried on regularly and systematically for profit, they constitute a distinct speculative business for set-off purposes. The fact that some contracts formed part of the assessee&#039;s broader trading activity did not change their speculative character. The losses were therefore correctly treated as losses in speculative business and disallowance was proper.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>