https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191413 The judgment confirmed a service tax demand of &8377;1,21,36,522 for the period April 2006 to March 2011, finding the appellants failed to pay tax on the full value of Security Agency services. The inclusion of various allowances in the assessable value was upheld, rejecting the appellants' argument that reimbursements should be excluded. Allegations of natural justice violations were dismissed due to inadequate responses to the Show Cause Notice. The tribunal required a pre-deposit of the balance of the tax liability with interest, with a stay on recovery pending appeal, emphasizing non-compliance consequences. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:34:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191413 The judgment confirmed a service tax demand of &8377;1,21,36,522 for the period April 2006 to March 2011, finding the appellants failed to pay tax on the full value of Security Agency services. The inclusion of various allowances in the assessable value was upheld, rejecting the appellants' argument that reimbursements should be excluded. Allegations of natural justice violations were dismissed due to inadequate responses to the Show Cause Notice. The tribunal required a pre-deposit of the balance of the tax liability with interest, with a stay on recovery pending appeal, emphasizing non-compliance consequences. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191413