<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191418</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the reopening proceedings due to the unsigned notice under Section 148 and the improper recording of reasons, rendering the assessment order invalid. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case, as the jurisdictional defects were sufficient to decide the appeal in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:34:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1179 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191418</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the reopening proceedings due to the unsigned notice under Section 148 and the improper recording of reasons, rendering the assessment order invalid. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the case, as the jurisdictional defects were sufficient to decide the appeal in favor of the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the reassessment order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>