<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341154</link>
    <description>The Special Bench decision in Neptune Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that additional taxable income disclosure is not mandatory for each assessment year in a settlement application under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Settlement Commission erred in rejecting the petitioner&#039;s applications for some years based on this requirement. An interim stay was granted to prevent the Assessing Officer from initiating proceedings for certain assessment years. Disputes for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 were settled at higher figures than proposed by the petitioner, leading to additional tax payable. The court deferred a decision on interim relief and scheduled the petition for final hearing alongside related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:28:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 124 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341154</link>
      <description>The Special Bench decision in Neptune Developers Pvt. Ltd. held that additional taxable income disclosure is not mandatory for each assessment year in a settlement application under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Settlement Commission erred in rejecting the petitioner&#039;s applications for some years based on this requirement. An interim stay was granted to prevent the Assessing Officer from initiating proceedings for certain assessment years. Disputes for Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15 were settled at higher figures than proposed by the petitioner, leading to additional tax payable. The court deferred a decision on interim relief and scheduled the petition for final hearing alongside related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>