<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341142</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal challenging the deletion of additions for salaries and administrative expenses under sections 40(ba) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court allowed the Counsel for the Revenue time to address objections raised by the Respondent regarding the reframed questions of law and the applicability of the respective sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 112 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341142</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay adjourned the appeal challenging the deletion of additions for salaries and administrative expenses under sections 40(ba) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court allowed the Counsel for the Revenue time to address objections raised by the Respondent regarding the reframed questions of law and the applicability of the respective sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>