<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 106 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341136</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IB for common expenses and scrap sales income, and reversed the disallowance under Section 14A related to exempt income. The judgments emphasized the consistency and reasonableness of the assessee&#039;s methods and the necessity for the AO to provide clear justifications for disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 106 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341136</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions regarding the deduction under Section 80IB for common expenses and scrap sales income, and reversed the disallowance under Section 14A related to exempt income. The judgments emphasized the consistency and reasonableness of the assessee&#039;s methods and the necessity for the AO to provide clear justifications for disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>