<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341115</link>
    <description>GI wires captively consumed in the manufacture of stay wire and barbed wire, both cleared on payment of duty, supported entitlement to Cenvat credit where the Revenue failed to substantiate its claim that the process was confined to mere galvanisation and not manufacture. The lower appellate authority&#039;s finding that the adjudicating authority had not proved the basis for denial remained undisturbed, and no substantial ground was shown to dislodge it. On that record, the challenge to credit failed and the order allowing the assessee&#039;s claim was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341115</link>
      <description>GI wires captively consumed in the manufacture of stay wire and barbed wire, both cleared on payment of duty, supported entitlement to Cenvat credit where the Revenue failed to substantiate its claim that the process was confined to mere galvanisation and not manufacture. The lower appellate authority&#039;s finding that the adjudicating authority had not proved the basis for denial remained undisturbed, and no substantial ground was shown to dislodge it. On that record, the challenge to credit failed and the order allowing the assessee&#039;s claim was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>