<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 84 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341114</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to the tax effect being around Rs. 68,000. Delay in filing was condoned. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, the learned Additional Solicitor General, represented the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 84 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341114</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition due to the tax effect being around Rs. 68,000. Delay in filing was condoned. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, the learned Additional Solicitor General, represented the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>