<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 76 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341106</link>
    <description>The court directed the second respondent to settle the balance amount and potentially the interest, subject to further review. The judgment emphasized prompt action on the refund and interest payment matters, ensuring a fair resolution for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 07:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 76 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341106</link>
      <description>The court directed the second respondent to settle the balance amount and potentially the interest, subject to further review. The judgment emphasized prompt action on the refund and interest payment matters, ensuring a fair resolution for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>