<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 68 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341098</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed due to nonpayment of interest amount despite the initial sum being deposited. The Court quashed the impugned orders on the condition that the appellant deposits the entire interest amount within eight weeks. The Court allowed the appeal partly, with directions for the Tribunal to hear and decide the appeal on its merits upon full payment of the interest amount within the specified timeframe. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 68 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341098</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed due to nonpayment of interest amount despite the initial sum being deposited. The Court quashed the impugned orders on the condition that the appellant deposits the entire interest amount within eight weeks. The Court allowed the appeal partly, with directions for the Tribunal to hear and decide the appeal on its merits upon full payment of the interest amount within the specified timeframe. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>