https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191398 Canteen workers were not treated as employees of the Reserve Bank of India because the Bank had no statutory or contractual duty to provide the canteen and no enforceable right of supervision and control over the workers. Mere subsidy, infrastructure support, nomination of representatives, and limited administrative involvement were insufficient to establish a master-servant relationship, so absorption and regularisation were unavailable. The earlier M.M.R. Khan ruling was held inapplicable because it depended on a special statutory railway canteen framework that was absent here, and the Industrial Tribunal award was set aside. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191398 Canteen workers were not treated as employees of the Reserve Bank of India because the Bank had no statutory or contractual duty to provide the canteen and no enforceable right of supervision and control over the workers. Mere subsidy, infrastructure support, nomination of representatives, and limited administrative involvement were insufficient to establish a master-servant relationship, so absorption and regularisation were unavailable. The earlier M.M.R. Khan ruling was held inapplicable because it depended on a special statutory railway canteen framework that was absent here, and the Industrial Tribunal award was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191398