https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191394 Section 151 CPC cannot be used to reopen the correctness of an appealable remand order when no appeal was filed, because Section 105(2) bars later challenge to that order and inherent powers cannot substitute for appellate review. In a dispute arising after jagir abolition and vesting of property in the State, the plaintiff's ownership on the relevant date still had to be determined because it affected entitlement to compensation under the statute. Final adjudication required the State to be impleaded so that the rights of all concerned parties could be decided completely and in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 02 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 15:04:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191394 Section 151 CPC cannot be used to reopen the correctness of an appealable remand order when no appeal was filed, because Section 105(2) bars later challenge to that order and inherent powers cannot substitute for appellate review. In a dispute arising after jagir abolition and vesting of property in the State, the plaintiff's ownership on the relevant date still had to be determined because it affected entitlement to compensation under the statute. Final adjudication required the State to be impleaded so that the rights of all concerned parties could be decided completely and in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191394