https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191392 A planning authority cannot refuse development permission merely because a revision of the development plan is contemplated; concrete material is required, and the statutory duty to have due regard to draft or final plans does not exclude other relevant material. On the facts, the municipal commissioner's refusal was unsustainable because no draft revised development plan existed when permission was rejected. The appellate authority was justified in granting sanction with conditions, since the order was made in public interest and the sanctioned plan was not inconsistent with the later published draft revised plan. The challenge to the grant of development permission therefore failed. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191392 A planning authority cannot refuse development permission merely because a revision of the development plan is contemplated; concrete material is required, and the statutory duty to have due regard to draft or final plans does not exclude other relevant material. On the facts, the municipal commissioner's refusal was unsustainable because no draft revised development plan existed when permission was rejected. The appellate authority was justified in granting sanction with conditions, since the order was made in public interest and the sanctioned plan was not inconsistent with the later published draft revised plan. The challenge to the grant of development permission therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191392