<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1654 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191382</link>
    <description>Post-sale discounts claimed through credit notes are deductible from taxable turnover under the KVAT scheme only if the assessee proves that the reduction is a genuine trade discount or a contractual discount traceable to a contract, agreement or established trade practice. The dealer must support the claim with contemporaneous records such as tax invoices, sale bills, credit notes, debit notes and monthly returns so the facts can be verified. Precedents on discounts cannot be applied in the abstract without examining the actual transaction documents. Because the factual foundation and verification were incomplete, the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1654 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191382</link>
      <description>Post-sale discounts claimed through credit notes are deductible from taxable turnover under the KVAT scheme only if the assessee proves that the reduction is a genuine trade discount or a contractual discount traceable to a contract, agreement or established trade practice. The dealer must support the claim with contemporaneous records such as tax invoices, sale bills, credit notes, debit notes and monthly returns so the facts can be verified. Precedents on discounts cannot be applied in the abstract without examining the actual transaction documents. Because the factual foundation and verification were incomplete, the impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>