https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341093 The court held that the AO exceeded the scope of remand by revisiting the issue of granting a waiver beyond the initial 85%. The court upheld the adjustment of the refund amount but set aside the review of the previous order. The petitioner was directed to deposit the balance within two weeks, partially allowing the writ petition without costs. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341093 The court held that the AO exceeded the scope of remand by revisiting the issue of granting a waiver beyond the initial 85%. The court upheld the adjustment of the refund amount but set aside the review of the previous order. The petitioner was directed to deposit the balance within two weeks, partially allowing the writ petition without costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341093