<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341088</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. No substantive adjudication on the merits was undertaken, and the pending application was also disposed of. The Court expressly kept the question of law open, so the order reflects only refusal of interference rather than any determination of the underlying legal issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:31:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 58 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341088</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the High Court&#039;s impugned order and dismissed the special leave petition. No substantive adjudication on the merits was undertaken, and the pending application was also disposed of. The Court expressly kept the question of law open, so the order reflects only refusal of interference rather than any determination of the underlying legal issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>