<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 40 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341070</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 17.07.2015 due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition set in the order dated 19.11.2014. However, the Court set aside the dismissal order and directed the Tribunal to provide the appellant with another opportunity to fulfill the requirements within a reasonable period, emphasizing the need for justice to be served.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:09:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 40 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341070</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the appeal by the Custom, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) on 17.07.2015 due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit condition set in the order dated 19.11.2014. However, the Court set aside the dismissal order and directed the Tribunal to provide the appellant with another opportunity to fulfill the requirements within a reasonable period, emphasizing the need for justice to be served.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>