<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341068</link>
    <description>The appellant successfully contested the short payment of service tax and penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78. The dispute revolved around differential service tax demand and entitlement to pay tax under the composition scheme of 2007. The Supreme Court clarified that there was no liability to service tax for composite works contracts pre-01/06/2007. The Tribunal found the denial of the composition scheme unjustified and allowed the appeal, leading to the disposal of the case regarding the differential service tax and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 38 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341068</link>
      <description>The appellant successfully contested the short payment of service tax and penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78. The dispute revolved around differential service tax demand and entitlement to pay tax under the composition scheme of 2007. The Supreme Court clarified that there was no liability to service tax for composite works contracts pre-01/06/2007. The Tribunal found the denial of the composition scheme unjustified and allowed the appeal, leading to the disposal of the case regarding the differential service tax and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>