<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 37 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341067</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order rejecting their rebate claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant were classified as taxable services offered by consulting engineers, not intellectual property services, making them eligible for export classification. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a fresh examination of the refund claims, allowing the appellant to submit further evidence to support their claims. The appeal was allowed for a comprehensive review of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for refund claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 37 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341067</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order rejecting their rebate claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005. The Tribunal determined that the services provided by the appellant were classified as taxable services offered by consulting engineers, not intellectual property services, making them eligible for export classification. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a fresh examination of the refund claims, allowing the appellant to submit further evidence to support their claims. The appeal was allowed for a comprehensive review of the appellant&#039;s eligibility for refund claims under the Export of Services Rules, 2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>