https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341066 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, emphasizing the appellant's liability to service tax under the Real Estate Consultant category. Penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 were set aside due to a reasonable cause for non-payment, with the invocation of Section 80 for penalty waiver. The decision focused on the correct classification of activities for tax liability, addressing the vagueness of the show cause notice and the demand for an extended period. The case highlighted the importance of accurate classification and compliance with tax obligations in determining the appellant's liability. en-us Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341066 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, emphasizing the appellant's liability to service tax under the Real Estate Consultant category. Penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 were set aside due to a reasonable cause for non-payment, with the invocation of Section 80 for penalty waiver. The decision focused on the correct classification of activities for tax liability, addressing the vagueness of the show cause notice and the demand for an extended period. The case highlighted the importance of accurate classification and compliance with tax obligations in determining the appellant's liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341066