https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341059 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, which favored the respondents, M/s. A.K. Electronics. The case involved allegations of manufacturing goods with another person's brand names without paying Central Excise duty. Despite the Revenue's contentions based on recovered branded goods and retracted statements, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the duty demand. The absence of sales history for specific goods, lack of brand name stickers, and the respondents' denial of manufacturing certain items led to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The decision was upheld on 28-10-2016. en-us Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:41:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341059 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, which favored the respondents, M/s. A.K. Electronics. The case involved allegations of manufacturing goods with another person's brand names without paying Central Excise duty. Despite the Revenue's contentions based on recovered branded goods and retracted statements, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the duty demand. The absence of sales history for specific goods, lack of brand name stickers, and the respondents' denial of manufacturing certain items led to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The decision was upheld on 28-10-2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341059