<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 16 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341046</link>
    <description>Imported goods described in the invoice and supporting documents as defective, rejected non-alloy steel sheets with tin coating were not proved to be tin plate waste or tin plate misprints. The chemical examiner&#039;s report supported the declared description and showed visible imperfections, so the Department&#039;s basis for treating the goods as waste, requiring a licence, and applying restricted-port import rules was unsustainable. The Department also failed to justify re-description or the proposed value enhancement from USD 190 per MT to USD 465 per MT. As a result, the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could not be maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:26:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 16 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341046</link>
      <description>Imported goods described in the invoice and supporting documents as defective, rejected non-alloy steel sheets with tin coating were not proved to be tin plate waste or tin plate misprints. The chemical examiner&#039;s report supported the declared description and showed visible imperfections, so the Department&#039;s basis for treating the goods as waste, requiring a licence, and applying restricted-port import rules was unsustainable. The Department also failed to justify re-description or the proposed value enhancement from USD 190 per MT to USD 465 per MT. As a result, the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty could not be maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>