https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341031 The court quashed the Enforcement Case Information Reports and order of attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in multiple writ petitions. It held that since the alleged offenses were committed before being included as scheduled offenses under the Act, the actions were without jurisdiction. The court emphasized that individuals cannot be prosecuted for offenses not listed as scheduled offenses under the Act. The court also emphasized the necessity of a conviction before initiating enforcement actions. Consequently, the court allowed all writ petitions and annulled the enforcement actions and attachment orders against the petitioners. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341031 The court quashed the Enforcement Case Information Reports and order of attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, in multiple writ petitions. It held that since the alleged offenses were committed before being included as scheduled offenses under the Act, the actions were without jurisdiction. The court emphasized that individuals cannot be prosecuted for offenses not listed as scheduled offenses under the Act. The court also emphasized the necessity of a conviction before initiating enforcement actions. Consequently, the court allowed all writ petitions and annulled the enforcement actions and attachment orders against the petitioners. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341031