<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (11) TMI 1208 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the issues related to transfer pricing adjustment and corporate tax for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to verify the comparability of instances furnished by the assessee to determine adherence to the arm&#039;s length principle. The appeal on penalty proceedings and interest levy was not pursued by the assessee and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:45:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (11) TMI 1208 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the issues related to transfer pricing adjustment and corporate tax for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the AO to verify the comparability of instances furnished by the assessee to determine adherence to the arm&#039;s length principle. The appeal on penalty proceedings and interest levy was not pursued by the assessee and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>