<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue Authority&#039;s Bid to Add u/s 40A Fails Due to Lack of Evidence on Excessive Legal Fees.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34092</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 40A - excessive payment to firm of advocates - one director being a partner of the firm receiving the fees - Revenue has not even remotely attempted to establish that the payment made to the Advocates for professional services was excessive. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:09:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:09:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463598" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue Authority&#039;s Bid to Add u/s 40A Fails Due to Lack of Evidence on Excessive Legal Fees.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34092</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 40A - excessive payment to firm of advocates - one director being a partner of the firm receiving the fees - Revenue has not even remotely attempted to establish that the payment made to the Advocates for professional services was excessive. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:09:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>