<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1653 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191336</link>
    <description>For deduction under section 80IB(10), a village Gram Panchayat acting under the applicable local law can qualify as the competent local authority to sanction a housing project and issue approval and completion-related certificates. The project was accepted on that basis because the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 conferred building-control powers within its jurisdiction. The statutory minimum land-area condition was also met, as the assessee produced sanctioned plans and layout material showing that the project, taken as a whole, exceeded one acre; that factual finding was not rebutted by contrary evidence. On these facts, the deduction conditions were treated as satisfied and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1653 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191336</link>
      <description>For deduction under section 80IB(10), a village Gram Panchayat acting under the applicable local law can qualify as the competent local authority to sanction a housing project and issue approval and completion-related certificates. The project was accepted on that basis because the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 conferred building-control powers within its jurisdiction. The statutory minimum land-area condition was also met, as the assessee produced sanctioned plans and layout material showing that the project, taken as a whole, exceeded one acre; that factual finding was not rebutted by contrary evidence. On these facts, the deduction conditions were treated as satisfied and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>