https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191340 Where the accused was not shown to be charged with a scheduled offence, the stringent bail restrictions under the money-laundering statute were held inapplicable. The alleged cricket betting activity, by itself, was treated as insufficient to attract the restrictive bail regime, and the absence of material linking the allegations to the earlier proceedings meant the case did not fall within Section 45(1). Bail was therefore considered under the ordinary principles of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and regular bail was granted on conditions. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:35:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191340 Where the accused was not shown to be charged with a scheduled offence, the stringent bail restrictions under the money-laundering statute were held inapplicable. The alleged cricket betting activity, by itself, was treated as insufficient to attract the restrictive bail regime, and the absence of material linking the allegations to the earlier proceedings meant the case did not fall within Section 45(1). Bail was therefore considered under the ordinary principles of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and regular bail was granted on conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191340