<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1192 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191345</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the appellant to deposit 10% of the principal tax demand before a specified date to enable the first appellate authority to hear the appeals on their merits without considering the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The orders of the appellate authority and the Tribunal were set aside, providing a new opportunity for the appeals to be reviewed based on the specified deposit and without the previous doubts raised by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1192 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191345</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the appellant to deposit 10% of the principal tax demand before a specified date to enable the first appellate authority to hear the appeals on their merits without considering the Tribunal&#039;s observations. The orders of the appellate authority and the Tribunal were set aside, providing a new opportunity for the appeals to be reviewed based on the specified deposit and without the previous doubts raised by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>