<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1176 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191346</link>
    <description>Questions were raised on whether the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to investigations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, whether the alleged offences are cognizable or non-cognizable, and whether statements recorded under section 50(2) are admissible. The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notice of motion on these issues and granted interim protection from arrest pending further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1176 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191346</link>
      <description>Questions were raised on whether the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to investigations under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, whether the alleged offences are cognizable or non-cognizable, and whether statements recorded under section 50(2) are admissible. The Punjab and Haryana High Court issued notice of motion on these issues and granted interim protection from arrest pending further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>