<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1177 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191347</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal concerning AMP expenditure and service charges not shown during the relevant year. Regarding the AMP expenditure issue, the Court held that no question of law arose in reconsidering the matter based on the directions in a previous case. For the service charges issue, the Court applied the principle of consistency and concluded that no question of law arose, dismissing the appeal and pending application as unmerited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1177 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191347</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal concerning AMP expenditure and service charges not shown during the relevant year. Regarding the AMP expenditure issue, the Court held that no question of law arose in reconsidering the matter based on the directions in a previous case. For the service charges issue, the Court applied the principle of consistency and concluded that no question of law arose, dismissing the appeal and pending application as unmerited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>