<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1178 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191349</link>
    <description>Bail pending appeal was granted after the Court considered the period already undergone in custody and found bail justified on the facts and circumstances of the case. The Court expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits of the appeal, limiting its decision to the appellant&#039;s entitlement to release during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:35:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1178 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191349</link>
      <description>Bail pending appeal was granted after the Court considered the period already undergone in custody and found bail justified on the facts and circumstances of the case. The Court expressly declined to express any opinion on the merits of the appeal, limiting its decision to the appellant&#039;s entitlement to release during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>