<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1523 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341020</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the notice issued under Section 158BC was invalid due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. It also held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to sustain additions without proper reasoning was not legally sustainable. The court emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and adherence to procedural compliance in income tax assessments, ultimately allowing the appeal and ruling against the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1523 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341020</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the notice issued under Section 158BC was invalid due to non-compliance with statutory requirements. It also held that the Tribunal&#039;s decision to sustain additions without proper reasoning was not legally sustainable. The court emphasized the necessity of corroborative evidence and adherence to procedural compliance in income tax assessments, ultimately allowing the appeal and ruling against the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>