<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1515 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341012</link>
    <description>Section 195 withholding was not attracted on remittances to a foreign parent for seconded employees because the payments were salary-related reimbursements, and the underlying income had already been taxed in India as salary. The existence of a service permanent establishment did not alter the result, as the receipts were matched by corresponding salary reimbursement expenditure and no taxable profit was shown. The fees for technical services characterisation also failed because the treaty test of making available technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes was not satisfied. Accordingly, no tax deduction obligation arose and the consequent demand could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 05:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1515 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341012</link>
      <description>Section 195 withholding was not attracted on remittances to a foreign parent for seconded employees because the payments were salary-related reimbursements, and the underlying income had already been taxed in India as salary. The existence of a service permanent establishment did not alter the result, as the receipts were matched by corresponding salary reimbursement expenditure and no taxable profit was shown. The fees for technical services characterisation also failed because the treaty test of making available technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes was not satisfied. Accordingly, no tax deduction obligation arose and the consequent demand could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>