<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1511 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341008</link>
    <description>Drawback on duty-paid inputs did not, by itself, bar refund of service tax paid on eligible export-related services under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T., because the drawback did not cover the services for which refund was sought. The refund claim was also treated as within time, as the Tribunal applied its earlier view that claims filed within the extended period prescribed by the notification were maintainable. CHA and courier services used for export of goods were held to fall within the refund framework for export-related services where service tax had been paid. On that basis, the denial of refund was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1511 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341008</link>
      <description>Drawback on duty-paid inputs did not, by itself, bar refund of service tax paid on eligible export-related services under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T., because the drawback did not cover the services for which refund was sought. The refund claim was also treated as within time, as the Tribunal applied its earlier view that claims filed within the extended period prescribed by the notification were maintainable. CHA and courier services used for export of goods were held to fall within the refund framework for export-related services where service tax had been paid. On that basis, the denial of refund was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>