<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1510 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341007</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 78 of the Finance Act for service tax liability on Business Auxiliary Services received from an overseas commission agent. Despite acknowledging the appellants&#039; delayed compliance, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the service tax amount following a High Court decision. The appellants agreed to adjust the penalty from the excess payment made, leading to the disposal of the appeal in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1510 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341007</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reduced the penalty imposed on the appellants under Section 78 of the Finance Act for service tax liability on Business Auxiliary Services received from an overseas commission agent. Despite acknowledging the appellants&#039; delayed compliance, the penalty was reduced to 25% of the service tax amount following a High Court decision. The appellants agreed to adjust the penalty from the excess payment made, leading to the disposal of the appeal in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=341007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>