https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340993 The Tribunal found no evidence of deliberate default or intent to evade duty by the respondents in a case concerning the admission of clearance of branded goods without duty payment. The penalties imposed on the respondent firm and its partners were set aside due to lack of evidence for deliberate defiance of laws. The appeal by Revenue was allowed in part to restore the demand of duty, while the appeal regarding penalties was dismissed. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340993 The Tribunal found no evidence of deliberate default or intent to evade duty by the respondents in a case concerning the admission of clearance of branded goods without duty payment. The penalties imposed on the respondent firm and its partners were set aside due to lack of evidence for deliberate defiance of laws. The appeal by Revenue was allowed in part to restore the demand of duty, while the appeal regarding penalties was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340993