<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1490 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340987</link>
    <description>The petitions were permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of, leaving the parties&#039; rights and contentions open for consideration by the Jurisdictional Local VAT Officer. The applicability of Section 47 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was specifically left open, so no determination was made on that issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1490 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340987</link>
      <description>The petitions were permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of, leaving the parties&#039; rights and contentions open for consideration by the Jurisdictional Local VAT Officer. The applicability of Section 47 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 was specifically left open, so no determination was made on that issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>