<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1017 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191333</link>
    <description>Discount under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules is allowable only where it follows regular practice or a contract, the invoice or bill of sale discloses the discount amount, and the accounts reflect payment of the reduced price. As the invoices did not show the discounts and that factual position was undisputed, the deduction was rightly disallowed. The rectification orders were held to be consistent with the statutory requirement, and no interference in writ jurisdiction was warranted under Article 226.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1017 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191333</link>
      <description>Discount under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules is allowable only where it follows regular practice or a contract, the invoice or bill of sale discloses the discount amount, and the accounts reflect payment of the reduced price. As the invoices did not show the discounts and that factual position was undisputed, the deduction was rightly disallowed. The rectification orders were held to be consistent with the statutory requirement, and no interference in writ jurisdiction was warranted under Article 226.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>