<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (5) TMI 6 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7300</link>
    <description>Once an assessment order is carried in appeal and confirmed, the original order merges in the appellate order and ceases to exist independently. On that principle, section 154 permits rectification only by the authority that can amend the subsisting order; the Income-tax Officer could not rectify a section 23A order after appellate confirmation. The rectification proceedings were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (5) TMI 6 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7300</link>
      <description>Once an assessment order is carried in appeal and confirmed, the original order merges in the appellate order and ceases to exist independently. On that principle, section 154 permits rectification only by the authority that can amend the subsisting order; the Income-tax Officer could not rectify a section 23A order after appellate confirmation. The rectification proceedings were therefore without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>