<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2631 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191307</link>
    <description>A Gram Panchayat competent under section 52 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 to sanction construction within village limits can constitute the local authority approval required for deduction under section 80IB(10). The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been accepted in the assessee&#039;s earlier years and followed coordinate Bench views treating Gram Panchayat approval as sufficient where the factual matrix showed development of residential units. On that basis, the claim for deduction was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:37:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2631 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191307</link>
      <description>A Gram Panchayat competent under section 52 of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 to sanction construction within village limits can constitute the local authority approval required for deduction under section 80IB(10). The Tribunal noted that the issue had already been accepted in the assessee&#039;s earlier years and followed coordinate Bench views treating Gram Panchayat approval as sufficient where the factual matrix showed development of residential units. On that basis, the claim for deduction was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>