<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1031 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191317</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favor of the respondent assessee, confirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Court found that the housing project met the necessary conditions, was completed on time, and had the required approvals from the Gram Panchayat. As no substantial question of law arose, the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 09:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463475" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1031 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191317</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favor of the respondent assessee, confirming eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The Court found that the housing project met the necessary conditions, was completed on time, and had the required approvals from the Gram Panchayat. As no substantial question of law arose, the appeals were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>