<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1482 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to levy fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015. It found intimations issued under section 200A for such periods unsustainable. The demands raised through section 234E fees were deleted, and the appeals succeeded on procedural and substantive grounds. The decision was rendered on 1st March 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1482 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the Assessing Officer lacked authority to levy fees under section 234E for periods before 01.06.2015. It found intimations issued under section 200A for such periods unsustainable. The demands raised through section 234E fees were deleted, and the appeals succeeded on procedural and substantive grounds. The decision was rendered on 1st March 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>