<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1475 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340972</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2), because its statutory classification by the competent authority was ative and supported by the certificate on record. The Tribunal applied the settled position that income-tax authorities cannot independently re-examine that classification to deny the benefit under section 80P(4); on those facts, the disallowance did not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:02:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1475 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340972</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act was entitled to deduction under section 80P(2), because its statutory classification by the competent authority was ative and supported by the certificate on record. The Tribunal applied the settled position that income-tax authorities cannot independently re-examine that classification to deny the benefit under section 80P(4); on those facts, the disallowance did not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>