<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1470 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340967</link>
    <description>Where gifts from close relatives were supported by passports, confirmations, NRE bank accounts and bank certificates, the assessee discharged the burden under section 68 by proving donor identity, capacity and genuineness of the transactions. The donors&#039; relationship was corroborated, the account balances were sufficient, and the Revenue produced no tangible material to show that the credits represented the assessee&#039;s income. A demand for donor returns or foreign bank statements would have required proof of the source of source, which was not required on these facts. The addition as unexplained cash credits was therefore not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1470 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340967</link>
      <description>Where gifts from close relatives were supported by passports, confirmations, NRE bank accounts and bank certificates, the assessee discharged the burden under section 68 by proving donor identity, capacity and genuineness of the transactions. The donors&#039; relationship was corroborated, the account balances were sufficient, and the Revenue produced no tangible material to show that the credits represented the assessee&#039;s income. A demand for donor returns or foreign bank statements would have required proof of the source of source, which was not required on these facts. The addition as unexplained cash credits was therefore not sustainable and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>