<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1466 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340963</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of amounts for non-deduction and short deduction of TDS, holding that TDS was not required on certain capital expenditures and disallowances cannot be made for short TDS deductions. The ITAT also found no violation of Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence. The judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1466 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340963</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the addition of amounts for non-deduction and short deduction of TDS, holding that TDS was not required on certain capital expenditures and disallowances cannot be made for short TDS deductions. The ITAT also found no violation of Rule 46A in admitting additional evidence. The judgment was pronounced on 22/03/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>