<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340961</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the proportionate allocation of administrative expenses towards work in progress (WIP) and directed the Assessing Officer to assess each expense on a case-by-case basis to determine direct relevance to projects. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded for further examination with the opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1464 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340961</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the proportionate allocation of administrative expenses towards work in progress (WIP) and directed the Assessing Officer to assess each expense on a case-by-case basis to determine direct relevance to projects. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded for further examination with the opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>