<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal, upholding the decision that the activities of the assessee-Respondents were not taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; and &quot;Cargo Handing Service.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that the activities were akin to processing of goods and did not meet the criteria for taxation. Citing precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-Respondents, affirming that the term &quot;production of goods&quot; required actual production and that certain activities within a factory premises did not constitute &quot;Cargo Handing Service.&quot; The appeal was thus dismissed, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1455 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the order-in-appeal, upholding the decision that the activities of the assessee-Respondents were not taxable under &quot;Business Auxiliary Service&quot; and &quot;Cargo Handing Service.&quot; The Tribunal emphasized that the activities were akin to processing of goods and did not meet the criteria for taxation. Citing precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-Respondents, affirming that the term &quot;production of goods&quot; required actual production and that certain activities within a factory premises did not constitute &quot;Cargo Handing Service.&quot; The appeal was thus dismissed, concluding the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>