https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340946 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the refund claim based on unjust enrichment. Relying on the buyer's certificate confirming non-payment of differential duty to the appellant and precedent from the Addison & Co. Ltd. case, the tribunal held that the appellant had met the criteria for unjust enrichment, entitling them to the refund. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine documentation in establishing unjust enrichment and ultimately favored the appellant in this case. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340946 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order rejecting the refund claim based on unjust enrichment. Relying on the buyer's certificate confirming non-payment of differential duty to the appellant and precedent from the Addison & Co. Ltd. case, the tribunal held that the appellant had met the criteria for unjust enrichment, entitling them to the refund. The decision emphasized the significance of genuine documentation in establishing unjust enrichment and ultimately favored the appellant in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340946