<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1440 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340937</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order allowing the refund in cash, emphasizing that if an assessee cannot utilize the cenvat credit account due to exemption status, a cash refund is justified. The decision was based on the interpretation of Section 11B of the Act, precedent from the M/s Max Power Infosystems case, and High Court judgments supporting cash refund entitlement when credit cannot be utilized. The judgment reaffirmed the settled principle that refund claims should be granted in cash when the cenvat credit account is unusable, ensuring the appellant&#039;s rightful entitlement to the refund amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=463411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1440 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340937</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order allowing the refund in cash, emphasizing that if an assessee cannot utilize the cenvat credit account due to exemption status, a cash refund is justified. The decision was based on the interpretation of Section 11B of the Act, precedent from the M/s Max Power Infosystems case, and High Court judgments supporting cash refund entitlement when credit cannot be utilized. The judgment reaffirmed the settled principle that refund claims should be granted in cash when the cenvat credit account is unusable, ensuring the appellant&#039;s rightful entitlement to the refund amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340937</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>